Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Taylor Walls

Taylor Walls

SS·TBR
Compare
Compare
PA
318
H
62
HR
4
AVG
.219
xwOBA
.262
PPG
1.60
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202645170.203.309.273.070.23925.9%11.8%14.1%08601.33—
202593318.219
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

318 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.262
xBA
1
.211
.285
.318
.099
.262
22.0%
8.2%
13.8%
4
13
149
1.60
—
202474253.183.284.247.064.25626.5%12.3%14.2%115730.99—
2023100349.201.305.333.132.27826.4%12.6%13.8%8231801.80—
2022142466.172.269.285.113.27625.8%11.2%14.6%8111701.20—
202149176.211.314.296.085.28727.8%13.1%14.7%14521.06—
xSLG
0
.314
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
1
84.3
Median EV
4
88.7
90th % EV
2
100.0
Barrel %
6
3.2
Hard-Hit %
3
26.2
Sweet-Spot %
45
35.7
Bat Speed
Avg
8
66.7
Median
9
68.4
90th %
4
72.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
93
20.5
Whiff %
80
17.5
K %
42
22.0
BB %
45
8.2
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
115
≈ 94th pctl
Chase cost
-13.6r
154 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-11.6r
206 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
45.3%
1,275 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-1.97
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
5+0%6+0%10+0%9+0%8+15%13+33%15+11%18+2%44+19%32+19%16+0%10+47%19-10%42-32%60-20%84-28%53+32%34+9%11+17%12-20%46-19%74-40%65-22%55+27%22+8%13+0%11+30%20+6%31+15%34-5%21+25%12544+0%8+18%111+0%6CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000