Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. SS peers

Rank #12 of 64

Each bar is one SS, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-200-1000+100Zach Neto
Zach Neto · #12
V⁻ 5VORP 25V⁺ 81
Zach Neto

Zach Neto

SS·LAA
Compare
Compare
PA
293
H
58
HR
13
AVG
.231
xwOBA
.323
PPG
2.42
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj98423.245.323.440.195.33925.7%8.2%17.5%17172192.23—
202665293.231
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
36
.323
xBA
3
.209
xSLG
.339
.450
.219
.323
30.4%
11.9%
18.5%
13
10
157
2.42
—
2025128555.256.320.473.217.34826.8%5.9%20.9%26263062.39—
2024160604.248.317.441.193.32023.2%6.5%16.7%23313452.16—
202384329.225.311.377.152.31423.4%6.1%17.3%951561.86—
45
.409
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
37
89.0
Median EV
42
92.0
90th % EV
46
104.6
Barrel %
72
12.3
Hard-Hit %
28
37.4
Sweet-Spot %
62
37.4
Bat Speed
Avg
25
68.4
Median
24
69.8
90th %
22
74.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
33
32.1
Whiff %
17
28.8
K %
9
30.4
BB %
72
11.9
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
94
≈ 27th pctl
Chase cost
-9.3r
77 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-3.4r
55 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
46.3%
456 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.78
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
23224+14%745+33%62+45%11-6%17-25%28-11%18-21%1945+63%16+24%21-25%36-17%29-52%21+22%94+32%19+33%21+25%24+23%13+8%1321+22%9+43%72+10%1021CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 456