Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Zach Neto

Zach Neto

SS·LAA
Compare
Compare
PA
604
H
135
HR
23
AVG
.248
xwOBA
.320
PPG
2.16
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202667307.228.337.437.209.31731.3%11.7%19.6%13101512.25—
2025128555.256
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
26
.320
xBA
15
.233
xSLG
.320
.473
.217
.348
26.8%
5.9%
20.9%
26
26
306
2.39
—
2024160604.248.317.441.193.32023.2%6.5%16.7%23313452.16—
202384329.225.311.377.152.31423.4%6.1%17.3%951561.86—
40
.420
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
17
87.6
Median EV
42
91.9
90th % EV
48
104.8
Barrel %
46
8.4
Hard-Hit %
28
38.8
Sweet-Spot %
7
30.7
Bat Speed
Avg
23
68.5
Median
31
70.6
90th %
35
75.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
27
31.0
Whiff %
30
25.8
K %
37
23.2
BB %
17
6.5
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
94
≈ 26th pctl
Chase cost
-46.0r
440 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-17.4r
311 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.8%
2,319 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.73
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
4135315+8%12+18%22+0%18+11%19+11%9+0%7+47%15-19%36-42%53-16%45-7%41+42%31+0%8+54%26-13%55-32%91-30%54-3%40+27%114+29%41+28%39+42%38+22%40+36%22+18%113+14%14+12%17+17%24+21%14+9%1141CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000