Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Zach Neto

Zach Neto

SS·LAA
Compare
Compare
PA
555
H
129
HR
26
AVG
.256
xwOBA
.348
PPG
2.39
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202665293.231.339.450.219.32330.4%11.9%18.5%13101572.42—
2025128555.256
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
69
.348
xBA
42
.250
xSLG
.320
.473
.217
.348
26.8%
5.9%
20.9%
26
26
306
2.39
—
2024160604.248.317.441.193.32023.2%6.5%16.7%23313452.16—
202384329.225.311.377.152.31423.4%6.1%17.3%951561.86—
83
.494
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
53
90.2
Median EV
65
93.8
90th % EV
51
105.7
Barrel %
81
14.0
Hard-Hit %
64
46.6
Sweet-Spot %
78
38.8
Bat Speed
Avg
28
69.1
Median
36
70.9
90th %
27
75.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
33
30.0
Whiff %
16
27.9
K %
10
26.8
BB %
15
5.9
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
92
≈ 21th pctl
Chase cost
-46.3r
411 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-14.8r
280 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.5%
2,165 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.82
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
24+0%63312+15%13+20%10+16%25+9%11+9%114+56%18-11%35-20%56-21%61-18%39+18%17+30%10+46%35+15%54-29%59-16%64-9%34+38%26+22%9+40%30+39%44+42%38+27%37+42%19+67%93+20%15+35%17+29%17+0%1551CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000